AloomModular AI data centres Request a study scope discussion

Aloom / Modular AI data centres / Brisbane, Australia

We develop
AI infrastructure.

Electricity in. Useful data out. Aloom develops and publishes concept-stage modular AI infrastructure for project-specific study.

For organisations that need AI capacity they control — government, regulated industry, research and energy — and don’t intend to become data-centre operators to get it.

A future project proposal would define customer inputs, third-party equipment, Aloom scope, fees, ownership and operating terms. Nothing on this page is a hardware quote, financing offer or delivery commitment.

  1. Site + power
  2. OEM compute
  3. Integration + build
  4. Operations + O&M
Request a study scope discussion Read the engineering basis

C250, MW1 and MW50 are proposed facility-input concept and accounting boundaries—not installed or available capacity, physical topology or a delivery schedule. Aloom has not yet delivered a customer system; Stage-0 operation runs at Moorooka.

ALOOM / MW1

Modular data centre

Functional concept / no built asset
Aloom MW1 functional concept boundary Concept overview of the MW1 boundary. A proposed project meter bounds facility input at no more than one megawatt. Four C250 accounting and failure-domain references sit inside that boundary. Power conversion, OEM racks, shared controls and heat-rejection functions are functional references only. The four 400 kVA transformer symbols represent a standalone Rev B reference and are not installed or deliverable capacity. Transformer topology, house supply, cooling technology, equipment count, duty, redundancy, utility capacity, performance and delivery remain open. No built or measured customer MW1 is represented. Directional traces are explanatory flow, not telemetry. C250 / 01 250 kW C250 / 02 250 kW C250 / 03 250 kW C250 / 04 250 kW SITE MV SERVICE / SELECTED IN STUDY 4 × C250 / 250 kW FACILITY ALLOC. 4 × 400 kVA / STANDALONE REF. TOPOLOGY OPEN · NOT INSTALLED HEAT-REJECTION FUNCTION METHOD · DUTY · COUNT · REDUNDANCY / OPEN ≤1.0 MW FACILITY INPUT DECLARED CONCEPT · NOT UTILITY CAPACITY ACCEPTED WORKLOAD OUT NO RATE CLAIM NO CRITICAL-IT · RACK-DRAW · SLA CLAIM EXPLANATORY FLOW · NOT TELEMETRY
Power busNetwork fabricControl planeO&M
Concept boundary
≤ 1.0 MW
C250 allocations
4 × 250 kW
OEM configuration
Open
Functional concept, not a built or measured customer system. Transformer topology, house supply, heat-rejection method, equipment count, duty, redundancy, OEM configuration and delivery remain open; any later project requires accepted studies and executed agreements. Directional flow is explanatory, not telemetry.

Commercial framework / Project-specific

Commercial terms
close in writing.

This page describes subjects a future proposal may address; it is not a quote or offer. Equipment treatment, Aloom fees, project costs, scope, exclusions, taxes, currency, delivery, ownership, finance and operating terms would be stated in written proposals and executed agreements.

Aloom commercial discussion boundary

Status map, not a buying process or delivery sequence. Six project-specific discussion subjects remain open or unquoted and close only through written proposals or executed agreements. No quote, offer, commitment, price, fee, timing, supplier availability, ownership, finance, construction, delivery, operations, capacity, performance or SLA is represented.

Commercial discussion boundary. This is a status map, not a buying process or delivery sequence.
Discussion subjectCurrent public postureWritten closure
Project inputsSite or control position; grid pathway; workload and acceptance; required timing. Open and customer-specific.Scoped study brief.
Third-party equipmentOEM configuration; supplier price and terms; currency; freight; tax; warranty; spares; availability; lead time. Unquoted, not ordered or reserved.Current written supplier quote and executed project treatment.
Aloom servicesStudy; development; procurement support; integration; commissioning; operations and maintenance. Scope and fee not quoted.Written Aloom proposal and executed agreement.
Ownership and financeCustomer ownership or another project structure may be evaluated. Structure open; no financing or capacity offer.Legal, tax, finance and counterparty approval, plus a separate agreement.
Study engagementPotential first paid engagement. No public fee, duration, deliverable, IP or reliance commitment.Scoped study proposal.
Later delivery and operationsPotential later phase only. Not committed; no build or operations-and-maintenance availability claim.Accepted studies, approvals, suppliers and finance, plus executed project and operations-and-maintenance agreements.
Commercial discussion map only. It identifies topics that a future project proposal may address; no equipment price, pass-through treatment, Aloom fee, study fee or duration, ownership or financing structure, supplier availability, capacity, programme, construction, delivery, O&M, performance or SLA is offered or guaranteed. Each item remains project-specific and closes only in written terms.
Request a study scope discussion

The system / Concept scale map

The rack is not
the data centre.

Aloom’s current concept architecture uses C250 as a 250 kW facility-input allocation, groups four C250 allocations as MW1, and reconciles 50 MW1 allocations inside the proposed MW50 campus boundary. These are concept/accounting relationships—not installed capacity, physical campus topology or a delivery schedule.

Concept scale map only. C250, MW1 and MW50 are facility-input concept and accounting boundaries. The map does not represent installed or available capacity, physical campus topology, a secured site, grid capacity or OEM supply, or a price, programme, performance, availability or delivery commitment.

Aloom concept scale map

Facility-input accounting relationship; not physical topology. No customer system has been delivered and this is not for construction.

C250 — Functional concept
250 kW facility-input allocation. Smallest coordinated cell boundary; not an independent facility. Status: no built customer cell.
Accounting relationship
Four C250 concept allocations.
MW1 — Customer-facing concept allocation
Four C250 allocations; no more than 1.0 MW facility input. Status: no built customer system.
Accounting relationship
50 MW1 allocations equal 200 C250 allocations for accounting only. Campus topology remains open.
MW50 — Campus concept boundary
No more than 50.0 MW facility input. Status: no site, grid capacity or OEM supply secured.

Not installed or available capacity and not a rack, hall, feeder or delivery schedule. Critical IT, rack count, topology, price, programme, performance and availability remain open and project-specific.

Evidence / Public boundaries

Evidence stays inside
its own domain.

Aloom public evidence boundaries

Status matrix comparing four separate public evidence domains: instrumented Stage-0 lab telemetry when the feed is current, published MW1 concept engineering, local Illumem software reconstruction in ideal mathematics with reproducibility open, and a complete-system target method with no current result. The rows are not roadmap stages, and evidence in one row does not validate another.

Four separate public evidence domains. Evidence in one domain does not transfer to another; this is not a product roadmap or delivery sequence.
DomainCurrent public evidenceStatusDoes not establish
Moorooka / Stage-0 hostSource accelerator telemetry when the public feed is current.Instrumented; Stage-0 lab.Facility efficiency, rack cooling, production resilience, representative MW1 silicon or an SLA.
MW1 / Rev B system basisE-001 and M-001 concept drawings, continuity references and five open project-basis closure gates.Published; concept only.A built or measured customer MW1, construction issue, or a capacity, performance or availability result.
Illumem / compiler transferSelected Mamba-130M projections reconstructed with ideal simulated MZI factors.Local software; reproducibility open.A physical loop or chip, coherent-state lifetime, or measured efficiency, latency, TOPS/W or thermal result.
Complete-system methodReconcile facility electricity with accepted workload output under an agreed boundary.Target method; no current result.A current LCUC, efficiency, capacity, availability, performance or SLA result.
Evidence-boundary map only. The four rows are separate evidence domains, not stages. Moorooka is a Stage-0 lab host; MW1 is published concept engineering; Illumem is software evidence in ideal mathematics; the complete-system boundary is a target method. Evidence in one row does not validate another. This is not a product roadmap, delivery programme, availability statement, customer deployment, or performance/SLA claim.

Discuss a study / Project-specific

Start with a scoped discussion.

Request a scoped study discussion. Any fee, duration, deliverables, assumptions, professional responsibility, IP or licence, reliance and permitted-use terms would be defined in a written study proposal.

  • Workload + acceptance questions
  • Site + grid screening inputs
  • Electrical + cooling concept scope
  • OEM configuration questions
  • Commercial assumptions + exclusions
  • Evidence + next-phase decision
Request a study scope discussion Read the MW1 basis of design

No commitment arises until the applicable written proposal is accepted. Equipment, capacity, price, programme, delivery and operating terms require separate executed agreements.